| |
|
. |
|||||||
|
EUCDW, May 2002 Shaping Social and Employment Policy ! We need more efficiency, not more catchwords Open Letter to the EPP and the EPP/ ED Parliamentary Party With regard to the debate on the term "open co-ordination" the EUCDW would like to give a reminder of the EPP's fundamental positions and calls for an "open debate" in the party and parliamentary group. The procedure of Employment Policy Guidelines, which was anchored in the EU Treaty, work successfully. It does not aim at standardising the employment policies of the EU Member States but at co-ordinating them with one another in a targeted manner. It is correct that we need (maybe fewer and) better guidelines, the measures called for must be verifiable and comparable. The guidelines must be made more precise with regard to a deadline for their implementation, the quantification of the targets set and the evaluation and assessment of the goals set. It is also necessary to further improve the efficiency of the employment policy guidelines but not to discontinue this "Luxembourg process". European employment policy was decisively shaped by Christian Democrats. The EPP and the EPP/ED parliamentary group would be well advised to continue their own successful policy. The EUCDW also expects that social partners will be involved to a greater extent in the implementation of the employment policy guidelines: at European level to a greater extent in the preparation of the employment policy guidelines, at Member State level to a greater extent in their implementation. This is also the EPP's policy: subsidiarity not only at regional, national and European level but also between governments on the one hand and social partners on the other. But it makes sense, - that the Member States learn from one another with regard to the necessary reforms - that we reduce existing barriers regarding the European job market by the Member States co-ordinating everything that can be co-ordinated without a change of the system (e.g. exchange on regulations regarding incapacity to work or on age limits regarding pensions) - that we in this way push ahead improvements in freedom and mobility within the European single market. Special forms of co-ordination of national policies are necessary for example with regard to social security. It is conceivable that reports could be made of experiences and deadlines for reaching certain joint goals co-ordinated. It is not conceivable to have procedures of co-ordination and harmonisation which lead not only to uncontrolled bureaucratic expense but which would also contravene our Christian Democratic principle of subsidiarity. With regard to this it is also a challenge for the EPP and the EPP/ED parliamentary group to define and specify the term "open co-ordination" in the spirit of freedom - responsibility - solidarity - subsidiarity. We want to shape politics, not just reject it. This is the position
not only of the European Union of Christian Democratic Workers. It is
also the position of the EPP, which can be read in the resolutions of
the congresses, from Athens to Berlin: http://www.epp-eu.org/
For further information : European Parliament
ASP 2 F 154
A
UNION OF VALUES - Berlin, January 13, 2001 228. The European Social Model 229. Europe will have no meaning unless it is both an economic and social Europe. The social market economy links the market mechanisms of supply and demand with the obligation to respect the dignity of every human being. The values of the European social model (performance and social justice, competition and solidarity, personal responsibility and social security) remain relevant in conditions of globalized markets and rapid industrial change. 230.
The challenge is to combine powerful new market forces with humanity
- economic dynamism with social responsibility - in the way we organise
our social security systems.
The
European Union of Christian Democratic Workers (EUCDW) consists of 23
workers' organisations from 15 countries and is an association of the
European People's Party (EPP).
|
. |
|||||||
| . |
. |